data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ccfe/6ccfed4bb4bed61a13b03bf8bff82f1c8457e7a0" alt=""
The Corso di Francia runs right through the middle of the Olympic Village. Apparently, it divided the housing for male athletes, to the east, from that for female athletes, to the west, although any notion of propriety was ruined by the use of the viaduct by Italian men to spy into athlete's bedrooms (I don't know how true this story is).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e646f/e646f99abad45d6945aaac50b1915b33e106fa25" alt=""
While the structure is more conventional than the two early bridge designs I featured last time, it still has its share of idiosyncrasy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfc32/cfc325445d0402400d37beba1617172494467fd0" alt=""
The beams are 16m long, precast and prestressed, a simple and economical solution for bridge viaducts that seems unusual for Nervi, who was not a great user of prestressing. More unusually, they are V-shaped in cross-section, with a very narrow bottom flange, and with the top flanges placed in contact. The overall cross-section of each viaduct therefore consists of a "corrugated" or V-wave profile, which is essentially similar to the approach Nervi had taken on a number of roof structures, including the Palazzo dello Sport.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56865/568658ef4ebff41d641d96595ae176c27133ddbe" alt=""
Leonhardt also criticises the adoption of column and crosshead piers to support the deck beams. Although this is the most straightforward solution to build, it is visually more congested than the alternative of having the crosshead integral with the deck and within its depth. The latter approach, however, requires temporary propping of the deck beams and construction of a more difficult joint detail.
Further information:
- Google maps / Bing maps
- Structurae
- Pier Luigi Nervi's works for the 1960 Rome Olympics [PDF], Iori & Poretti, Actas del Cuarto Congreso Nacional de Historia de la Construcción, Cádiz, 2005
No comments:
Post a Comment