data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef964/ef964ce8f0e2684774e463a6acdbc4bf40e4bcd8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/357f5/357f50ed2ec714f0b308d69a69e8b3a2d50a2d67" alt=""
The modernist outlines of the arches, both below and above decks, conflict with the more traditional sculpting on and above the main bridge piers. The parapets also change type between the main span and the approach spans, for no reason which is readily apparent. The approach span arches also come a little too close to the deck for comfort, clumsily breaking the extrados line.
While this sort of tension between the functional and the decorative was maybe not uncommon on bridges of the early twentieth century, several engineers had already moved beyond it (most notably in connection with reinforced concrete arch bridges, Robert Maillart), and it seems at odds with the more modernist work completed by Torroja elsewhere (e.g. the Algeciras Market Hall or the Zarzuela Hippodrome).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1efb/b1efbd4c42a63816e60567b259ccd1056123639e" alt=""
The main arch spans 210m, with a rise of 65m (various sources give the span as 192m, I believe that is the clear span at reservoir level, while 210m is the theoretical span to centres of springings). This rail bridge had the longest span for a concrete arch bridge when built, beating the 188m spans of Freyssinet's Plougastel Bridge. The Martin Gil Viaduct was only the largest for a short time, beaten by the 264m Sandö Bridge in 1943.
Plougastel was built using timber centering, perhaps the largest timber arch centering ever built. The Martín Gil Viaduct had begun construction in 1934, before the Spanish Civil War, and its main arch was also to be built on timber centering, which had already been erected when the war disrupted progress. The approach spans had also been completed. By the time construction restarted, the original designer Francisco Martín Gil was dead, and the centering had been too badly damaged by the weather to be used.
Torroja took on the task of completing the project without altering Martín Gil's basic arch design.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e1af/8e1af6ac4a436c2b79abc0ee3c9b9d9453228728" alt=""
Torroja adopted a centering frame comprising two parallel braced trusses (pictured right - all black-and-white images are taken from The Structures of Eduardo Torroja), erected by hanging temporarily from a suspension cable. The finished frame had the form of a three-hinged arch, and it was stabilised against wind and buckling by temporary lateral stays.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b563d/b563df8b3f39a8637539474914233fe17158d4d0" alt=""
Parts of the top chords were concreted first, then parts of the bottom chord. The composite steel and concrete frame then created was strong enough to support progressively larger concrete pours.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0912/f09123a23809ad2a6f9bddf75f14f78e9ecfd0ca" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7aa0/a7aa00e342858c2f66c7cc2b0dd83b284b92ed4e" alt=""
The Martín Gil Viaduct is perhaps less successful visually, due to the lack of any formal continuity between the main span and the much shorter approach arches, with their sturdy masonry piers in marked contrast to the very slender spandrel columns in the main span. However, it was a tremendous engineering accomplishment.
Related links:
- Martín Gil Viaduct at Structurae
- Martín Gil Viaduct on Google Maps
- Martín Gil Viaduct at Wikipedia (Spanish)
- Martín Gil Viaduct at Todotrenes.com (Spanish, lots of information on the planning of the scheme prior to Torroja's involvement)
- Viaducto Martín Gil parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (Spanish, PDF, articles published in the public works journal in late 1942 and early 1943, with excellent photos of construction, technical drawings etc - essential documents)
3 comments:
Thanks for post my photos.
Gracias
Gracias
Post a Comment