data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47285/4728542a998129a7cc5565da98fc03e8404a6a18" alt=""
I've mentioned this footbridge previously, but had the chance to return and photograph it again, so it's getting its own post this time. Unlike many of the bridges I feature here, it's certainly not because of its beauty.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b12f0/b12f06fb1757ee3535899f833c17a5f0678c9b3c" alt=""
It's the sort of bridge which is very easy to imagine looking good on a drawing: simple, regular geometry; an interesting cross-section combining the pentagonal truss with the tubular "glazing"; and the thought that the bridge would be light and open in outlook.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d815/9d81565047507762abd73624edecab9d99abadd5" alt=""
The lessons for designers, I think, relate not only to the need to understand how a bridge will look in three dimensions, but also to plan to facilitate maintenance (such as cleaning, difficult here). Avoiding materials that don't cope well with a lack of maintenance should also be high up the agenda.
Further information:
2 comments:
There was an identical bridge in Lewisham SE London from this time until 2000 or so. It was bright yellow... later red. Same deterioration issues.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=lewisham+centre+footbridge&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=4_xDU9_ZL8yI7AbulYCwAQ&ved=0CAgQ_AUoAg#biv=i%7C0%3Bd%7C3wDaGyM3pgWBKM%3A
Post a Comment