data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/198a5/198a5ab0abec6a2965f5be07b0af7b1e63cc4b2e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e35c/4e35c3ae8a0eade4fa85df6a55070dae1405342c" alt=""
In the time of the credit crunch, the bridge looks somewhat forlorn (an impression enhanced by STV's melancholy video soundtrack). There was always doubt about whether this bridge actually led anywhere (in theory, it's to help regenerate the south bank of the River Clyde, but until the regeneration happens there's little to go and see). However, until the wider economy recovers, it's likely to look like something of a white elephant. Unlucky timing for a bridge meant to provide the area with a sense of excitement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dff7/1dff744aa94dce92486eb1be4e22762d40ee54ab" alt=""
The geometry of the various arrowhead surfaces seems designed to bring it to a point at its tip, while keeping steelwork in simple planes for ease of fabrication. But the effect looks a little odd, especially on the shaft of the arrow, where the box member walls taper in different directions. I find the connection of the "stays" to the deck a little peculiar too, likewise the way in which the arrowheads offer only a very limited visual response to the curvature of the deck (compare for example the more dynamic pylons on the South Quay Footbridge in London, especially in its original full S-shaped configuration).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64c56/64c56d121226c5470827d6ef6ff8f15600fe4d6c" alt=""
I admire the minimalist simplicity of the design, while longing for the far greater sense of occasion that the original competition entries generally offered. Only time will tell what the Glasgwegians think of it.
1 comment:
It sucks!
Post a Comment