Showing posts with label awards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label awards. Show all posts

24 July 2018

Awards shortlists announced

The shortlist has been announced for the Structural Steel Design Awards 2018. Bridges projects on the shortlist include:
There are also several bridges featured in the shortlist for the British Construction Industry Awards 2018:
  • Chapel Street Bridge upgrade, Salford
  • Highbury Corner Bridge replacement
  • M4 River Usk Bridge Strengthening and Rehabilitation
  • Mersey Gateway Bridge 
  • Queensferry Crossing
  • Somers Town Bridge
  • The Ordsall Chord
The BCIAs also shortlist Leeds Flood Alleviation Scheme and London Wall Place, both of which have interesting bridges as part of the wider projects. There may be others, it's not always easy to tell from the scheme names.

I've included links to structures that I've previously featured here. I will be reporting on the London Wall Place walkways soon as well. Hopefully I can visit some of the others some day.

Winners for both the above awards schemes will be announced in October.

Finalists have also been announced for the European Steel Bridge Awards, with a winner to be announced in September:
  • The Railway Bridge line Hohenau-Prerov, Czech Republic
  • Rethebrücke, Germany
  • Loftnesbrui, Norway
  • Årstabron, Sweden
  • Parkbrug Spoor Noord, Belgium
  • Footbridge for Pedestrians, Cycles and Reduced Mobility, Luxembourg
  • Jungle Pedestrian Bridge, Norway

20 December 2017

BAMPOTs make headlines

It already seems so long ago since I announced the winner of the Bridge Awards for Mediocrity and Plain Old Terribleness, the BAMPOTs. The Millennium Bridge in Ourense, Spain, received the garland for the worst structure, winning by a comfortable margin (photo courtesy Victor Hermida Prada).


Now, local news site La Voz de Galicia has picked up on this momentous news, with a feature which opens:
Does the Millennium Bridge of Ourense deserve a distinction for mediocrity? The jury of a UK-driven award has no mercy: "It's tormenting"
Some of the comments on the site are interesting, such as this one (translated via Google, so apologies if I haven't got it quite right):
This judgement is curious coming from British experts. In the United Kingdom it is very common indeed to see ultramodern architectures cohabiting with ancient monuments.
I will confess to being British, but I will note here that the BAMPOTs jury was international in its origin and experience.

I also liked this comment:
What does the world know? Everything that is done in Galicia is the best in the world, from the magnificent Gaias' mausoleum for honour and memory of the unsurpassed Fraga, passing through this bridge unmatched in beauty and functionality to the Lalín stew that we already know is also the best of the world.
I couldn't quite tell if that one was being ironic or not.

Some of the other comments claim a liking for the bridge, which I find interesting mainly because it illustrates an enduring gulf between professional and non-professional taste. The BAMPOTs were judged by people who have a significant level of expertise in the field, and who are no doubt aware that the public often espouse a different aesthetic to professionals.

I think this is a challenge which is too rarely "bridged": to promote wider understanding of the reasons why professionals see certain attributes as positive or negative, as well as to promote professional sympathy for public views, which are often emotionally rather than intellectually grounded.

14 October 2017

Bridge Awards for Mediocrity and Plain Old Terribleness - The Winner!

I announced the Bridge Awards for Mediocrity and Plain Old Terribleness (the BAMPOTs, for short) back on 3rd September. Twenty-two bridges were nominated by the blog's readers, and passed to a panel of bridge experts to produce a shortlist of the worst of the worst, which was announced on 1st October. The shortlist was opened up to a final public vote.

This convoluted process is of course just a way of getting myself off the hook ... I didn't nominate, shortlist or vote for any of these bridges, so don't blame me!

Anyway, the votes are in, the counting is done, and we have a winner!

Seventy-three people voted. In reverse order, the votes are as follows:
  • Arch footbridge near Exeter, UK: 7 votes (9.6%)
  • Cumberland River Bridge, Nashville, USA: 8 votes (11.0%)
  • Lucky Knot Bridge, China: 13 votes (17.8%)
  • Seabraes Footbridge, Dundee, UK: 15 votes (20.5%)
  • Millennium Bridge, Ourense, Spain: 30 votes (41.1%)
So what can be said about a bridge which won over two-fifths of our discerning audience (and, incidentally, which was unanimously the worst rated bridge by the judging panel)? (All photos courtesy of Victor Hermida Prada).


The nominator was anonymous, and said: "My vote goes to: Millenium bridge... in Ourense, Spain. I don't think it needs much explanation, just type 'puente del milenio ourense' in Google and the images will make clear why!"

A comment on Twitter is also illuminating regarding the context for the bridge:

The judges said: "I will never understand the 'creative mind' that came up with this. It has more than a smack of 'emperor's new clothes' about it" ... "Exquisite in the dictionary sense meaning 'piercing, excruciating, agonising, harrowing, tortuous, tormenting'" ... "It has everything: Absolute lack of respect for the valuable collection of historic bridges in the city, a deck depth that makes any other structural help unnecessary, lots of unnecessary structural help, inclined pylons (verticality is overrated) that lead to clumsy over-designed piers that try to relate to the inclination."


I think it is undeniably an awful bridge, and well deserving of recognition as this year's top BAMPOT. I'd echo all the comments from the third judge above - its largest offence is its ungainly combination of multiple geometries, none of them designed well in their own right, and worse when plastered on top of each other. The walkway gimmick gives the initial impression of being a suspension bridge, but instead it's the killer garnish that overpowers everything else.

It's a hard bridge to look away from, but only in the same sense as a car crash. I'd certainly love to visit it, and indeed the Ourense tourist office promotes it as a significant attraction, along with their other bridges.


I'd like to thank everyone who nominated or voted for the BAMPOTs, and particularly the judging panel who showed sound judgement and also impressive endurance.

What do others think? Is the Ourense bridge a worthy winner? Do you think one of the other bridges should have won, and if so, why? Please use the blog page comments feature to provide feedback!

01 October 2017

Shortlist announced for Bridge Awards for Mediocrity and Plain Old Terribleness (the BAMPOTs)

Back on 3rd September, I invited nominations for the Bridge Awards for Mediocrity and Plain Old Terribleness, a.k.a. the BAMPOTs.

Twenty-two bridges were nominated in all, and I engaged the services of a secret cabal of high-powered bridge experts to evaluate each nomination, and prepare a shortlist of the worst examples. Each member of the cabal scored the bridges independently, and the shortlist is based on the worst average scores.

These were the 17 bridges nominated but just not quite bad enough to make the grade:

Many thanks to everyone who took the time to nominate these bridges! For further details of why they were nominated, see the comments to my original post.

The top five bridges have been shortlisted below, and I'll invite you, the public, to vote on which is the worst. See the end of this post for details of how to vote!


The nominator said: "But when you get to the end of the arch, all is revealed, or perhaps “nothing” is revealed ... The arch is mere decoration."

The judges said: "Crime of the century; a cross between blood curdling and blood boiling. There are all too many examples of bridges with decorative structure but somehow a false arch is a greater affront on natural justice than a cod cable stay or a suspicious suspension bridge" ... "Clearly the client had money to burn, what with the decorative arch and all" ... "The combination of a deep deck and a low-responsibility structure above it is something Calatrava has been doing for a long time, but the lack of connection between both in this case, pushes it to a further level."


The nominator said: "When you start with a box girder then change your mind to a suspension bridge".

The judges said: "An interesting combination of old-school suspension-bridge stone end-gates, pylons with bracing design inspired by the logo of a lodge, and cables that could be made with shoe laces" ... "My head hurts looking at this" ... "Belt,  braces and sturdy shoes with a Scottish heart and a Greek face. What's not to like?"


The nominator said: "This monstrosity should need little in the way of comment, but I will specifically draw attention to the way in which what could have been an interesting whimsy has been ruined by someone who can only draw with a super-fat pencil; and the absence of any step-free access, inexcusable in such a major crossing regardless of the local culture".

The judges said: "An awful bridge that has managed to make its grim surroundings look quite attractive by comparison" ... "Great stuff! The materialisation of the napkin sketch of an obvious easy-selling idea. But it is much more than this, it also includes multiple walking routes (none of them accessible for disabled people, but maybe there are no disabled people in Chinese megacities), gigantism, and a bright red colour to piss you off in case you don’t like it."


The nominator said: "My vote goes to: Millenium bridge... in Ourense, Spain. I don't think it needs much explanation, just type 'puente del milenio ourense' in Google and the images will make clear why!"

The judges said: "I will never understand the 'creative mind' that came up with this. It has more than a smack of 'emperor's new clothes' about it" ... "Exquisite in the dictionary sense meaning 'piercing, excruciating, agonising, harrowing, tortuous, tormenting'" ... "It has everything: Absolute lack of respect for the valuable collection of historic bridges in the city, a deck depth that makes any other structural help unnecessary, lots of unnecessary structural help, inclined pylons (verticality is overrated) that lead to clumsy over-designed piers that try to relate to the inclination."


The nominator said: "I have real doubts about this one."

The judges said: "A camel is a horse designed by committee" ... "If you had left a three-year-old playing with a bridge catalogue you would probably have got a more logical result" ... "Interrupted arches, stupid structural scheme combination. Works like this one are the reason why some people hit their foreheads with the palm of their hands when they are told that an architect will be involved in the bridge project they will be working on."

How to vote
You have until midnight (UK time) on Friday 13th October, to vote here.

10 September 2017

Footbridge 2017 Awards winners announced

The winners of the 2017 Footbridge Awards were announced at the Footbridge 2017 conference in Berlin last week. I previously shared the list of shortlisted entries.

Short span (30m or less)
Winner: Merchant Square Footbridge, London, UK
Highly commended: Cykelsgangen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Highly commended: Waalhaven Bridge, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Medium span (30m to 75m)
Joint winner: Park Bridge Spoor Noord, Antwerp, Belgium
Joint winner: Weinbergbruecke, Rathenow, Germany
Highly commended: Inner Harbour Bridge, Copenhagen, Denmark

Long span (more than 75m)
Winner: Beer Sheva High-Tech Park Bridge, Beer Sheva, Israel

Jonathan Speirs Footbridge Lighting
Winner: George C King Bridge, Calgary, Canada

Historic renovation or reuse
Winner: Como Park Footbridge, Saint Paul, USA

I was struck at the conference by a number of excellent recent bridges which were presented at the event, but not featured on the awards shortlist. From discussion with those involved, it seems several of these were not submitted, which is a shame, as although the award winners all appear to be well-deserving, they offer only a snapshot of what is good out there.

What is impressive about the winning structures is their diversity, representing a good range of superior visual appearance alongside technical achievement and in several cases a degree of eccentricity.

Meanwhile, for anyone who thinks that these awards are terribly lopsided and that bad bridges deserve a share of publicity too, note that the Bridge Awards for Mediocrity and Plain Old Terribleness (the BAMPOTs) are still inviting nominations, until 15th September. I've currently received 19 suggestions, and readers will be pleased to learn that I have appointed a panel of anonymous yet prestigious international judges to sift through them all and come up with a shortlist, to be put to public vote in due course.

03 September 2017

Introducing ... the Bridge Awards for Mediocrity and Plain Old Terribleness

The "Carbuncle Cup" has been running for several few years now, a contest to uncover the worst examples of new British architecture, and it's never been short of material. For non-UK readers, the origin of that contest's name can be found at Wikipedia and elsewhere.

Many thanks to Bridge Design and Engineering magazine on Twitter, who recently asked the following question with regard to the Carbuncle Cup:
Do we need it? Not really. Should we do it anyway? Well here it is, the inaugural BAMPOTs. (Again, for readers unfamiliar with the source idiom, see online).

I'm a firm believer that we (the industry that promotes, designs and builds bridges) can learn as much from failure as from success, and we should never be afraid of being honest. The idea of learning from structural failure has a long tradition, but here I'm looking to consider a wider range of failures: function, appearance, delivery etc.

When better to announce this new award than in the week when some of the industry's very best will be celebrated at the Footbridge Awards? The need for some balance feels pressing.

I have some ideas of my own for candidates for this award, but I'm inviting open nominations here: just visit this page on the blog, and add your suggestion(s) in the comments. Please include a link to details of the bridge, and a brief description of why you think it deserves wider attention. Keep it short and to the point. Don't be libellous - I may not publish inappropriate comments.

Bridges should either have been completed within the last decade, or the site of a "failure" incident within that same time (e.g. a botched restoration etc). I'll stretch those limits if a particularly good candidate is put forward.

I'm not including unbuilt bridges, as I think London's Garden Bridge would currently have too large an advantage.

The deadline for nominations is midnight (GMT) on Friday 15th September, although it may be extended if I don't get sufficient response (or this whole exercise may be unceremoniously binned!) Please help get the word out by sharing a link to the BAMPOTs via social media etc: let's make a success out of celebrating failure together.

Subject to getting enough nominations, I'll then organise some kind of voting system to decide on an appropriate winner or winners.

02 August 2017

Structural Awards shortlist announced

The Institution of Structural Engineers has revealed the shortlist for the 2017 Structural Awards.

Of particular interest here are the Vehicle Bridges and Pedestrian Bridges categories. I've visited one of the three shortlisted vehicle bridges, but none of the others.

Elsewhere in the Awards, the very innovative ElevArch system is shortlisted under four separate categories: Structural Transformation, Construction Innovation, Outstanding Value and Sustainability.

Winners will be announced on 17th November.

27 June 2017

Footbridge Awards 2017

The shortlist has been announced for the triennial Footbridge Awards. Winners will be announced on 6th September at the Footbridge 2017 conference in Berlin.

I've posted links below to sites where you can find more information about the entries. I've only visited two, Merchant Square Footbridge and Greenwich Reach Swing Bridge. Most of the others are new to me. In general, there are some interesting bridges here, please share opinions via the comments if you want to!

Short span
Medium span
Long span

06 January 2017

Footbridge Awards 2017

The triennial, global Footbridge Awards have returned in time for the Footbridge 2017 conference.

Pedestrian and cycle bridges opened to the public in the years 2014 to 2016 are eligible for submission in one of five categories:
  • Short span: For new footbridges with a maximum clear span of 30m or less
  • Medium span: For new footbridges with a maximum clear span of between 30m and 75m
  • Long span: For new footbridges with a maximum clear span greater than 75m
  • Renovation: For a project to renovate or refurbish an existing footbridge, or to repurpose another type of bridge to be used by pedestrians, cyclists and/or equestrians
  • The Jonathan Speirs Lighting Award: For a lighting scheme on a new or existing footbridge of any size. Created in memory of Jonathan Speirs of Speirs and Major. 
Award entries need to be submitted by 6th March 2017, and the winners will be announced at the Footbridge 2017 conference in Berlin on 6th September 2017.

19 July 2014

Footbridge Awards 2014 winners

The winners of the 2014 Footbridge Awards were announced a few days ago at the Footbridge 2014 conference in London. I'll hopefully have more to say about the conference soon, but for now, here are the winning bridges. I posted the full shortlist previously.

I will keep my own comments to a minimum, but would welcome further opinions via the blog comments facility.

Short span
Winner - Smedenpoort Twin Bridges, Bruges, Belgium - Ney and Partners
This is a truly flabbergasting design. I doubt that many engineers other than Ney and Partners would have had the faith that they could make such slenderness work.

Highly Commended - Bleichwiesensteg, Backnang, Germany - Schlaich Bergermann and Partners
I keep staring at this bridge design and wondering about its peculiarly upside-down quality - the compression strut and tension hinge look like they should be a tension tie and compression hinge.

Highly Commended - Campusbrücke Opladen, Germany - Knippers Helbig / Knight Architects
I'm not 100% sure that I understand this bridge, which is geometrically complex and difficult to "get" from just one image, but I do love the use of simple patterns to generate considerable visual interest.

Highly Commended - Vluchthaven Bridge, Amsterdam, Netherlands - Ney and Partners
I'm not sure what I like better about this, the rail-less balustrades, or the folded steel plate deck.

Medium span
Winner - Jarrold Bridge, Norwich, UK - Ramboll
Discussed here back in 2012.

Highly Commended - Geniedijk Bridge, Netherlands -
I can't find a lot of information on this bridge on the internet. The V-shaped theme and use of weathering steel are attractive, as is the detailing, but I do dislike bridges with 3m tall anti-vandal barriers - are they really necessary, or did the client only think they would be?

Highly Commended - Slinky Bridge, Oberhausen, Germany - Schlaich Bergermann and Partners / Tobias Rehberger
When I first saw pictures of this bridge, I found its frivolity, particularly the "slinky" spiral itself, somewhat garish and dispiriting. Closer examination reveals a very well detailed stressed ribbon bridge, and what looks to be an attractive and jolly combination of colour and shape.

Highly Commended - Media City Footbridge, Salford, UK - Wilkinson Eyre / Ramboll
I visited this bridge in 2011.

Long span
Winner - Bow River Bridge, Banff, Canada - StructureCraft
This was up against some pretty impressive competition on the long span shortlist. It's unusual to see timber in bridges this long (an 80m central span), certainly of the beam type.

Highly commended - Peace Bridge, Londonderry, UK - AECOM / Wilkinson Eyre
Sometimes it seems there is little more to be said in the hi-tech, modernist style which Wilkinson Eyre have made their own, but the Peace Bridge is something new within that space (overlapping self-anchored suspension spans), and also a very well detailed example of how it should be done.

Refurbishment
Winner - Mala Panew River Bridge, Poland
The write-up in the Awards booklets indicates this to be an exemplary restoration and strengthening of a historic bridge, built in 1827. A paper was presented at the conference, but I can find no useful information on the project online.

Jonathan Speirs footbridge lighting award
Winner - Castle Green Bridge, Taunton, UK - LDA Design / Moxon Architects / Flint and Neill
This strikes me as the sort of design that the late Dan Flavin would have put forward if he were designing visitor access ramps rather than minimalist art installations. That can only be a good thing, in my opinion.

17 June 2014

Footbridge Awards 2014

The shortlist has been announced for the triennial Footbridge Awards. Winners will be announced on 16th July at the Footbridge 2014 conference in London.

I've posted links below to sites where you can find more information about the entries. I've only visited two, the Media City Footbridge and the Stratford Town Centre Link. I've also featured the Jarrold Bridge here, although not visited it yet. Most of the others are new to me. Some of them are quite brilliant, so it's well worth taking time to browse through the links below.

Short span


Medium span


Long span


Refurbishment


Jonathan Speirs Footbridge Lighting Award

14 August 2013

IStructE awards shortlist announced

Okay, this news is a few days old now, but ... the Institution of Structural Engineers have announced the shortlists for their 2013 Structural Awards. The award winners will be announced on 15th November.

They have a number of categories, but two are relevant here:

Highway or Railway Bridge Structures
King Abdul Aziz Flyover
Taizhou Bridge
Walton Bridge

Surely an easy winner for the pioneering Taizhou Bridge (pictured below)?


Pedestrian Bridges
Anaklia-Ganmukhuri Pedestrian Bridge
Castle Green Bridge
Olympic Park Footbridge
Pembroke College Footbridge
Teign Crossing Cycle Bridge

A couple of these were new to me. I'd seen the lovely little Castle Green bridge before, but really it's exaggerating to call it a bridge at all. The Pembroke College bridge is a charming little curio, but my vote would go to the Anaklia-Ganmukhuri Pedestrian Bridge (pictured below), proof that timber can be exploited in ways most engineers would never consider.

14 September 2011

Bridges shortlisted for IStructE awards

This year's Institution of Structural Engineers awards feature a number of bridge schemes.

The pedestrian bridges shortlist has:
I will reserve comment, due to lack of time, but feel free to click the comment button and add your own!

The reconstruction of the Mizen Head Footbridge is shortlisted in the Heritage category, while the Sheikh Zayed Bridge is shortlisted under Transportation Structures.

The winners will be announced on the 8th November.

11 July 2011

Footbridge Awards 2011: Winners

The winners of the Footbridge Awards 2011 were announced at the Footbridge 2011 conference in Wrocław, Poland, on 6th July. The venue was Wrocław Town Hall, and the awards results were dominated by Belgium's Ney and Partners, and Germany's Schlaich Bergermann und Partner (SBP). I will have more to report from the Footbridge conference when I get time.

I've included links if I have previously posted anything substantial on the individual bridge.

Aesthetics short-span
Winner: Castleford Footbridge, England (McDowell & Benedetti / Alan Baxter Associates).
Highly commended: Bracklinn Footbridge, Scotland (Strong Bridges / David Narro Associates); Glass Footbridge, Portugal (SBP / Charles Correa Associates).

Aesthetics medium-span
Winner: Te Rewa Rewa Footbridge, New Zealand (Novare Design).
Highly commended: Lyon Confluence Footbridge, France (RFR); Knokke-Heist Footbridge, Belgium (Ney).

Aesthetics long-span
Winner: Rhein-Herne Canal Footbridge, Germany (SBP).
Highly commended: Collegebrug, Belgium (Ney / Sumproject); Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg (Ney / Metaform Atelier d'Architecture).

Technical short-span
Winner: Stalhillebrug, Belgium (Ney).
Highly commended: Marinic Footbridge, Slovenia (Ponting); Glass Footbridge, Portugal (SBP / Charles Correa Associates).

Technical medium-span
Joint winners: Knokke-Heist Footbridge, Belgium (Ney); Riverside Footbridge, England (Ramboll).
Highly commended: Paloma Footbridge, Spain (Cesma Ingenerios); Tradeston Footbridge, Scotland (Halcrow / Dissing + Weitling).

Technical long-span
Winner: Rhein-Herne Canal Footbridge, Germany (SBP).
Highly commended: Forthside Footbridge, Scotland (Gifford / Wilkinson Eyre); Collegebrug, Belgium (Ney / Sumproject); La Defense Footbridge, France (Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes / SBP).

21 June 2011

Footbridge Awards 2011 - technical above 75m span

Right-o, it's time to (briefly) cover the final batch of designs shortlisted for this year's Footbridge 2011 awards, this time the long-span bridges in the technical stream. Thanks once more to Frame and Form for posting all the images, and as on previous posts, you can visit their website to see the pictures, which I won't repeat. You can also now simply click here to see all my posts on the 2011 shortlist.

I've previously commented on four out of the six bridges, as they also featured in the aesthetics category: Center Street Bridge, Des Moines; College Bridge, Kortrijk; Passerelle la Defense, Paris; and Grimburg Harbour, Gelsenkirchen. Of those, the College Bridge and Passerelle la Defense are the technical standouts, I would say.

The other two candidates are the Forthside Bridge, Stirling, and the Kurilpa Bridge, Brisbane. Both are a tangle of masts and cables, and essentially a variation on the classic cable-stayed bridge. Forthside is what is popularly called an "inverted Fink truss", while Kurilpa is a simplified tensegrity structure, but both rely on the successive cantilevering of cables from main support pylons.

I've discussed both Forthside and Kurilpa here before. Both are technically impressive, although to some extent only in how they resolve the problems of their own making, as the architectural concept determines the structural form as much as arising from it.

The winners in each category will be announced on 6th July.

17 June 2011

Footbridge awards 2011 - technical 30m to 75m span

Once again, those kind people at Frame and Form have posted pictures of some of the shortlisted bridges in this years Footbridge 2011 Awards, this time in the medium span / technical category.

I've discussed the Knokke, Paloma and Riverside bridges before, so won't repeat that again.

Glasgow's Tradeston footbridge was the more pragmatic afterthought to a failed bridge design competition (see previous post). The contest had produced an extravagant and unaffordable winner, and the promoter switched to a design-and-build approach to procure the bridge which was eventually built.

I admire its stark aesthetics, and it's always great to see that quality rather than corner-cutting crap can emerge from the D&B process, but I'm not so sure of the bridge's technical merits. The deck is exceptionally slender, but it's hard to see what else on the bridge was a huge technical challenge.

The Peace Bridge, in Tbilisi, Georgia, is a very different creature. The architect, Michele de Lucchi, was personally invited by the President of Georgia to propose designs for a 160m long pedestrian bridge over the River Kura. His three designs were all covered structures, with the as-built organic form being chosen on purely aesthetic grounds over folded-shell and "parachute" alternatives (de Lucchi's paper at the 2010 IABSE Venice Symposium provides full details). What was built differs considerably from the architect's original proposal, chiefly due to the need to provide a more rational structural form for the glazed steel grid-shell.

Clearly, construction of a bridge of this sort is a very real technical achievement. The grid-shell supports the bridge deck on hangers, and its geometry has been simplified by extruding a common parabolic section along its length. However, it is not a structurally efficient means of support, and even if it were, its shape has not been optimised for the loads upon it. Does technical merit for a bridge reside in responding to a difficult architectural challenge, or in establishing an efficient and effective solution to the structural requirements? Both are valid, and the engineering designer has done well, but this bridge still leaves me a little uncomfortable.

The 73m span Robert I Schroeder footbridge in California is a more coventional bridge, but still impressive. It is suspended from twin steel "butterfly" arches, with the thrust into the ground taken by inclined concrete struts. The arches themselves are in the form of triangular space trusses, and the logic of the structural form has been translated into good looking details, particularly the treatment of the parapets.

It's an admirable looking bridge, although certainly less technically exciting than the Knokke footbridge competing in the same category.

11 May 2011

Footbridge Awards 2011 - technical up to 30m

Okay, I've previously provided some commentary on the 2011 Footbridge Awards shortlists for short, medium and long-span bridges under the "aesthetics" heading. Now it's time for those that fall under the "technical" heading, although there is some overlap.

Frame and Form have posted images of the short-span technical shortlist, and as before, please just visit their blog if you would like to see the pictures!

Three bridges on the technical shortlist are also on the aesthetics shortlist: Castleford Footbridge, the Glass Bridge in Lisbon, and the Buitengracht bridge in Cape Town. I don't have anything to add to what I said previously on the Castleford or Lisbon structures.

In the case of Buitengracht, it appears F&F may have pictured the wrong bridge. I think the right one is the one now posted at Future Cape Town. There are also several images from the contractors, Vusela Construction, and a technical description at Skyscrapercity.

The challenge with this footbridge was to minimise the length of the approach ramps, while allowing access to the bridge from the side. Reducing the ramps means minimising the construction depth, which is the depth between the footway surface and the underside of the bridge. This is normally achieved by raising the bridge girders above the deck (in the "half-through" form), or suspending the deck from above (with a bowstring arch or cable-stayed layout).

At Buitengracht, the designers opted for a "quarter-through" design, raising a box girder above one edge of the deck, and relying on its torsional stiffness for overall stability. That allowed exits from the opposite edge of the bridge deck. It partly explains why the parapets are very different, with a post-and-rail arrangement on one side, and a glazed screen above the edge girder, which also acts as a wind-break.

There are two other bridges on the technical shortlist.

The Marinic bridge in Slovenia, would appear to be a footbridge in the spectacular Škocjan Caves, possibly the one known as the Cerkvenik Bridge. This spans an amazing underground abyss. I can't find much information online, but would imagine the challenge was to design a bridge which could be built in a remarkably inaccessible and difficult location!

The Stalhille Footbridge is another design by Ney & Partners, their fourth on the awards shortlists. This is an opening bridge over a canal in Flanders, with an opening system which may be unique.

Generally, there are six basic systems available for an opening bridge:
  • rotation about bridge's longitudinal axis (tilt, or "blinking eye")
  • rotation about bridge's transverse axis (bascule)
  • rotation about bridge's vertical axis (swing)
  • translation along bridge's longitudinal axis (retracting)
  • translation along bridge's transverse axis (possibly used on some floating bridges?)
  • translation along bridge's vertical axis (lifting or submersible)
There are some feasible combinations of these, particularly for retracting bridges which move at an angle to the transverse and longitudinal axes, and for "driven" bridges such as passenger boarding bridges in airports. There are also a very small number of oddities which involve transformation of the bridge's geometry, as with Schlaich Bergermann's Duisburg and Kiel bridges, or Thomas Heatherwick's Rolling Bridge. And of course, there are transporter bridges which solve a related problem, but aren't really opening bridges as such, perhaps having more in common with the cable ferry.

Ney's Stalhille design is a variation on the second and sixth types, whereby there are two pivot points lying above the bridge deck, allowing the entire deck to remain level while it is swung up and away from the canal. Structurae puts it in a class of its own, a pendulum bridge.

Spanning a mere 26m, it's far from clear why such a system would be chosen in preference to the more conventional options. Ney note that the bridge deck's static system (a simply supported beam) is preserved in all situations, but the same is true of a lifting bridge. I imagine that coordinating the rotating mechanisms so that the bridge remains level requires a carefully designed control system. I also wonder quite how the joints at either end of the deck are detailed, to avoid one being "clipped" as the bridge deck falls into place.

I do particularly like the bridge's filigree parapets, which are a lovely combination of ancient and modern.

Updated 20 June 2011:
The bridge in Slovenia is actually this one, which remains an impressive piece of engineering at a difficult location - I'd recommend following the link to see the photos!

09 May 2011

Footbridge Awards 2011 - aesthetics above 75m span

Once again, those kinds folks at Frame and Form have posted pictures of the shortlisted entries to the Footbridge 2011 Awards, this time for the "long span / aesthetics" category. As on my two previous commentaries, I won't repeat the images here, just visit Frame and Form to see them.

I haven't covered any of the bridges on this shortlist previously, which is a shame, as several are very impressive.

The Center Street Bridge, in Iowa, is a variant on the now classic typology whereby a curved or straight bridge deck is hung from an inclined arch. In Iowa, the bridge has a vertical arch, and twin curved decks hung either side which to some extent counterbalance each other. The decks are in the form of closed steel box girders to provide the necessary torsional stiffness, given that they are supported by cables on only one edge.

The twin decks allow foot and cycle traffic to be separated, although there is also a short transverse "strut" deck between the two main spans which provides space to stop and admire the view. From the photos I've seen, it looks to be an attractive, well-detailed bridge, which has a touch of the iconic without appearing inappropriately brash.

Ney and Partners have done well to receive a number of shortlistings, and their College Bridge in Kortrijk, Belgium, is a very interesting design. It's an S-curved suspension bridge, 203m long, with a main span of 86m. The main cable follows the funicular line of forces, and supports the deck using a "warren truss" type arrangement of hangers, which provides greater stiffness than the normal arrangement of parallel hangers. The tightness of the S-bends is sufficient to allow the two masts to be inclined towards the deck. The masts are held against movement by tie-down cables connected via the deck to ground, which must contribute enormously to the overall stiffness of the system.

The deck is stiffened further by lateral edge trusses, although I'm not sure I see how these work, as I would have though the deck itself was wide enough to provide sufficient lateral stiffness. Vibration dampers have been avoided, which is a respectable achievement for a lightweight cable-supported bridge like this. In some photos the bridge looks inappropriately long and massive, but in others it looks just right.

The bridge at Esch-sur-Alzette is also by Ney, but is a very different beast. It's remarkable in many ways, including its bold response to a very challenging site, where it must span a railway, avoid overhead service cables, and carry people across a considerable difference in levels (achieved via a lift and stair tower at one end). Unlike a number of structures, the lift tower is completely integrated into the structural form, which lies somewhere between stressed-skin construction and truss design. The truss frame can be seen either as a membrane structure with stiffening ribs, or as a simple truss where the gusset plates have been allowed to grow unhindered. Overall, it takes the form of one half of a three-pinned portal frame.

The frame is painted grey on the outside, red on the inside, and is remarkable in its appearance, particularly the illuminated interior at night. Ney & Partners are easily amongst the most consistently interesting European bridge designers, and it's great to see them getting recognition on this shortlist.

One firm who have also long held such acclaim is Schlaich Bergermann & Partners, who have two bridges on this particular shortlist. The first is the Passerelle La Defense, in Paris, which was designed in collaboration with Feichtinger Architectes. It's an 88m long bridge in the almost-popular "inverted Fink truss" form (which really needs a new name, since it simply doesn't match the topology of an actual Fink truss, inverted). What makes it remarkable is that it curves round the outside of an existing building, seemingly defying gravity. Most of the truss masts appear to hang mysteriously in mid-air, balancing on a set of horizontal cables which are actually there to restrain twisting in the deck, not to hold it up.

SBP have designed some excellent bridges over the years, but I'd say this is probably one of their best efforts.

Their other shortlisted design is the Grimburg Harbour footbridge at Gelsenkirchen. This owes more of a debt to classic SBP designs of previous decades, being another hi-tech reinterpretation of ring-girder and suspension bridge forms. It's not at all a bad bridge, but it seems a lesser achievement when set next to the Paris design.

From a technical standpoint, the cable layout leaves me slightly queasy. The curved deck is supported on its outer edge by a suspension bridge type arrangement, with parallel hangers extending to a suspension cable. The main cable isn't supported directly on towers, as would be normal, but from two subsidiary cable which are held up by a guyed mast. What makes me queasy is simply the thought of how you might maintain the structure should any of its main cables ever require replacement. The arrangements required to maintain temporary stability would be awkward, at the very least.

24 April 2011

Footbridge awards 2011 - aesthetics 30m to 75m span

Frame and Form has published images of the next set of shortlisted entries to the 2011 Footbridge Awards - the "aesthetics" category for bridges spanning between 30m and 75m. Again, please see their blog post for the images.

I covered the Knokke Heist Footbridge here near the end of 2009. Designed by Ney & Partners, it's a tour-de-force of structural design, synthesising a number of individually great ideas and producing something which is spectacular but still graceful.

Taking the bending diagram for a three-span continuous beam as their starting point, they stripped away unnecessary material stage by stage to evolve a structure which is a unique hybrid of suspension bridge, stayed bridge, and steel girder. It borrows from the form-finding techniques of structural fabric design, with a thin steel skin draped between points of support, cradling the bridge deck and providing a seemingly effortless response to the three dimensional geometry and load requirements.

In many ways, it's an inverted version of Robert Maillart's Tavanasa Bridge. I admire it for its undeniable panache but also for the ability to take a challenging concept and follow it through what must have been a very demanding fabrication and construction process without losing anything to pragmatist compromise.

Barcelona's Sant Fruitós Footbridge, designed by Pedelta, pairs the classic inclined arch typology with the use of stainless steel and GFRP elements. I always find this kind of design slightly forced when, as here, the deck is straight in plan, as the arch inclination has no real structural justification, it's just an affectation intended to add interest to what would otherwise be a fairly straightforward footbridge over a highway.

Despite the awkwardness of a lift tower and staircase at one end, the design doesn't seem unbalanced, and is a good example of its kind. It's interesting to compare Calatrava's La Devesa Bridge at Ripoli, which also has an inclined arch and the issue of very different approach levels to resolve. The Calatrava Bridge has the elegant combination of a cantilevering end support with a staircase, killing two birds with one stone, but the use of cables rather than "bracket arms" at Sant Fruitós gives a lighter and hence more pleasant appearance overall.

The Paloma Footbridge is quite a different proposition. Spanning a highway in Madrid, this bridge is curved in plan, but eschews the counterbalancing cable-stayed or inclined arch support system that may suggest in favour of a warren truss along only the outer edge of the deck. It isn't entirely unique, and reminds me in concept of the Mancunian Way Footbridge, which also had a truss along its curved outer edge.

On the Paloma structure, the main truss appears to be stabilised by a secondary truss connected to its top chord, and sitting flat to provide stiffness against out-of-plane movement of the main truss. It's a neat conception, mainly because it also carries a canopy and hence provides some level of shade and shelter.

What I like about this bridge is not just the interesting structural form, but the quality of the detailing, which looks to be quite impeccable from the photos available.

The Sant Fruitós inclined arch has a cousin on the shortlist, the Riverside Bridge in Cambridge. It was designed by Ramboll, and adopts the white colour that so many of this kind of bridge seem to share. Its main span over the River Cam comprises an inclined tubular steel arch supporting on one side the footway deck, and on the other a cycleway deck. The two decks are carried by transverse "wishbone" members, and supplementary cables, which balance the loads such that out-of-plane bending of the main arch is minimised.

I'm keen to pay it a visit, but based on photographs, it seems only partially successful. The split deck, which seems clever at first, also complicates the overall geometry, multiplying the balustrades and eliminating the simple elegance which inclined arches can normally boast.

I've covered New Zealand's Te Rewa Rewa Bridge here before, and have little to add to my previous comments. The asymmetry of its arch ribs has no structural logic, but seems visually compelling. The detailing lifts it beyond dozens of minimalist Calatrava clones, such as the way the ribs extend above the arch spine. It's definitely one of my favourite bridges on the shortlist.

RFR's Lyon Confluence Bridge is a fine riposte to the structural showmanship of so many post-Millennium footbridges. Timber decking sits on a relatively straightforward tubular steel arch structure, made very slender in line with a number of other recent RFR designs. Indeed, it looks so slender that I wonder whether a minor impact from a boat wouldn't be enough to bring it down, but presumably they will have considered that.

I can find no information on the Butarque Footbridge, in Spain, online, other than the photograph provided at Frame and Form. It shows a bridge which appears to have a deck with a triangular cross-section, supporting a rail-less balustrade. If anyone can point me to any other images, please leave details using the comments link below.

21 April 2011

Footbridge Awards 2011 - aesthetics up to 30m span

Excellent! Those spiffy bloggers at Frame and Form have provided some images of the structures shortlisted for these awards, kindly saving me the bother and making it easier for me to comment on some of the entrants. So far, they've posted pictures of the entries under the short span (below 30 metres) / aesthetics category - go to their post for the images, I won't repost them here.

Judged purely on aesthetics, I'd want the Castleford Footbridge to win. It's a beautifully well-judged structure, tip-toeing gracefully across the river like a slow-motion ballerina, artful and expressive without ever having to be inappropriately demonstrative. It doesn't exhibit the need to show off, but its sinuous layout, use of the main girders as benches, and extensive presence of timber, all offer a humanistic approach to bridge design that's entirely appropriate to its setting.

Lisbon's Glass Bridge is technically impressive but somehow a bit inert, too simply cylindrical. The Corporation Street Bridge in Manchester does it better, as did the Glazen Brug in Rotterdam.

The Bracklinn Falls Bridge, at Callander in Scotland is another structure which is undoubtedly interesting but not necessarily "beautiful". I plan to visit it at some point and cover it in more detail. The combination of huge, rustic tree trunks with more modern timber and steel elements is striking, as is the setting. However, the triangular elevation, while robustly pragmatic, has no finesse to it.

I find the Buitengragt Pedestrian Bridge, in Cape Town, South Africa, more disconcerting than attractive. The deck is supported by stays from an inverted steel pyramid. It gives an impression of instability, and its hard to see why a stayed bridge was justified for such a short span at all.

The Yale Hillhouse Pedestrian Bridges, in Connecticut, USA, are not my favourite bridges for overall appearance, but I hugely admire their ingenuity. I recall seeing these previously, and the perforated, corrugated steel webs remain a delight. The corrugations help to stiffen the upper member of the side trusses against buckling, as well as preventing buckling of the webs themselves, while allowing the web plate to be very thin. The perforations hark back to Ithiel Towne's 19th century lattice trusses, one of many old truss designs ripe for reinvention.

Together, these two features significantly reduce the weight of the girders (although clearly only at the expense of much increased fabrication costs). An article in the ASCE's Civil Engineering magazine explains more. It's a shame this design isn't in the "technical short span" category, it's a very impressive piece of structural engineering.