12 February 2009

Bridge criticism 9: Bridge aesthetics by numbers

›
In the previous post , I took a look at Santiago Calatrava's prescriptions for how the quality of bridge design can be judged. Often see...
4 comments:
10 February 2009

Bridge criticism 8: The good, the bad, and the ugly

›
The previous post in this thread discussed the modernist article of faith that informs most engineering criticism: that bridges should be e...

Bridges news roundup

›
Lots of big posts in preparation, so just time for a short interlude with some recent (and some slightly stale) bridge news: Auditor eyes ...
2 comments:
06 February 2009

Bridge criticism 7: Moralists on the march

›
In the previous posting in this thread, I discussed the public criticism (and it's lack of assistance to the unfortunate client) surrou...
2 comments:
05 February 2009

Bridge criticism 6: Too little, too late

›
In a series of recent posts, I've wondered why there's so little public criticism of poor bridge design . Perhaps engineers feel res...
2 comments:
03 February 2009

Bridge competition debris part 9: Peabody Trust Habitable Bridge

›
Updated 8/Feb/09: New Edward Cullinan images added (all copyright Edward Cullinan Architects) The Peabody Trust is a London-based social h...
02 February 2009

Bridge competition debris part 8: Rijnhavenbrug

›
In December last year, a winner was announced in a competition to design a new moveable footbridge in Rotterdam. My Dutch is non-existent so...
1 comment: